← Back to Op-Ed

215 Years Is Not a Plan

By Shuchi Binte Shahjalal, Associate Editor, The South Asian Story

23 July 2026·4 min read

Gender & Women's Rights
Share

I was the daughter who got to stay in school. That sentence shouldn't feel like a distinction, but in Bangladesh it still is one. Families here continue to invest more in secondary education for boys, while girls are more likely to be pulled into household work, leading to more absences, weaker academic outcomes, and higher dropout rates — and the gap isn't marginal. Girls in Bangladesh drop out at a rate 9% higher than boys, and the country ranks 71st out of 146 in gender parity. I got the version of childhood where math didn't apply to me. Most girls don't.

I saw what the other side of that math looks like in 2025, in a school in Noakhali. The girls there weren't failing to engage with their studies for lack of ability. Marriage was simply the more real plan in the room—the one their parents were actively orienting them toward, not as a fallback if school didn't work out, but as the actual point. Nobody needed to tell them school mattered less. It had already been decided for them, at home, before anyone asked what they wanted.

That's not an isolated impression. Bangladesh has the highest rate of child marriage in Asia—nearly 42% of children are married before 18, up from 30% in 2018—and the rate is rising, not falling. Child marriage is one of the leading reasons adolescent girls leave school and counts as a form of sexual violence against children in its own right, with girls forced into it facing worse health outcomes and higher rates of domestic violence afterward. A curriculum can't compete with a wedding a family has already decided on. What I watched happen quietly in a Noakhali classroom is the same decision playing out at a national scale.

Money decides who this happens to. Nearly 69% of women with no education were married before 18—and Bangladesh's own data shows secondary enrollment for girls at just over 83%, but only 59% actually complete it, meaning close to a quarter of the girls who start secondary school are gone before they finish it, for reasons that have nothing to do with their grades. The girls I met in Noakhali weren't struggling with the material. They just weren't being asked to imagine a future built around it.

The one number that should reframe how this gets discussed is the education-marriage relationship itself. Child marriage rates only begin to fall among girls with at least ten years of schooling and drop below 50% only among those with twelve years or more. That's not a footnote. It's the whole argument. Every additional year a girl stays enrolled is doing something no awareness campaign can do on its own—it's functioning as the actual intervention. And yet at the current pace, Bangladesh is reducing its child marriage rate by only 2.1% a year, which would take roughly 215 years to eliminate the practice—a timeline that makes the 2030 target the country signed onto close to meaningless.

Reductions in child marriage have been sharpest among affluent, educated girls, while the practice remains stubbornly high among underprivileged, uneducated, and rural girls. I was in the first group by accident of birth, not merit. The girls I sat with in Noakhali were not. Nobody there needed a survey to tell them their odds — their parents had already made the calculation, and the calculation didn't put a classroom on the winning side.

None of the levers here are complicated. Keep girls enrolled through secondary school, and marriage rates fall on their own. Bangladesh already knows this—the livestock and stipend programs that pay families to keep individual daughters enrolled prove someone in this country understands the mechanism. What's missing isn't knowledge. It's the willingness to fund that mechanism at the size of the actual problem, instead of the size of a classroom in Noakhali that one visitor happened to walk into and never forgot.

Share